Urinary excretory processes in men with urolithiasis treated during the pandemic of COVID-19
ORIGINAL STUDIES
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Androgen deficiency can boost stone formation in kidneys, therefore androgen replacement therapy is successfully used in the treatment of patients with urolithiasis on the background of androgen deficiency. There are numerous publications describing the work of urologists during COVID-19 pandemics however they are all devoted to organization of medical aid. Increased risk of urolithiasis during COVID infection is mentioned as well as the general decrease of physical activity during COVID and general decrease of life quality. On the other hand, the direct effect of androgen deficit not to mention the influence of augment androgen therapy on the background of COVID has never been studied.
AIM: The aim of this work was to find out the possibility of using this type of therapy in the treatment in the conditions of COVID-19 pandemic as far as electrolyte metabolism and urinary excretion processes — the central links in the pathogenesis of urolithiasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 199 male patients age 25 through 68 years were studied while under treatment at Urologic Dept. of St. Elisabeth Clinical Hospital in Saint Petersburg. Laboratory and clinical parameters were registered at he beginning of stationary treatment, after in ended and also in 4 and 12 months. Some of реу studies were accomplished in triplets skipping the moment of discharge from the hospital. Out of 99 patients received only traditional therapy (contact ureterolitotripsy after distant litotripsy) while 100 patients got androgenous replacement therapy.
RESULTS: Based on the results of treatment of 199 men suffering from urolithiasis, it was found that COVID-19 infection did not create fundamental contraindications for the use of androgen replacement therapy in the treatment of urolithiasis.
CONCLUSION: In patients with urolithiasis suffering from COVID-19 infection and receiving androgen replacement therapy, there was no additional increase in pathologic processes associated with the underlying disease, i.e., androgen replacement therapy was not contraindicated, therefore in case of pandemic recurrence, androgen replacement therapy can be used in the treatment of urolithiasis.
References
Васильев А.Г., Тагиров Н.С., Назаров Т.Х., и др. Современные аспекты этиологии и патогенеза мочекаменной болезни // Педиатр. 2014. Т. 5, № 3. С. 101–109. doi: 10.17816/PED53101-109 EDN: STDBSP.
Комяков Б.К., Акимов А.Н., Тагиров Н.С., и др. Чрескожная нефролитотомия в лечении мочекаменной болезни у больных с гипогонадизмом. В кн.: Сборник статей в честь 35-летия Елизаветинской больницы. Санкт-Петербург, 2017. С. 170–174.
Комяков Б.К., Васильев А.Г., Гулиев Б.Г., и др. Заместительное введение андрогенов пациентам с гипогонадизмом и уролитиазом. В кн.: Актуальные вопросы урологии и андрологии. 2011. С. 66–69.
Комяков Б.К., Акимов А.Н., Тагиров Н.С., и др. Коррекция гипогонадизма у больных мочекаменной болезнью. В кн.: Сборник статей в честь 35-летия Елизаветинской больницы. Санкт-Петербург, 2017. С. 154–157.
Назаров Т.Х., Гулиев Б.Г., Стецик О.В., и др. Диагностика и коррекция метаболических нарушений у больных рецидивным уролитиазом после удаления камней эндоскопическими методами // Андрология и генитальная хирургия. 2015. Т. 16, № 3. С. 22–28. doi: 10.17650/2070-9781-2015-16-3-22-28 EDN: ULHBXH.
Смирнова Н.Н., Куприенко Н.Б. Уромодулин и его роль в образовании почечных конкрементов у детей и подростков // Детская медицина Северо-Запада. 2022. Т. 10, № 1. С. 44–48. EDN: AEEUCA.
Лемешко Б.Б., Лемешко С.Б., Постовалов С.Н., Чимитова Е.В. Статистический анализ данных, моделирование и исследование вероятностных закономерностей. Компьютерный подход. Новосибирск: Изд-во НГТУ, 2011. 888 с. EDN: TZNHMX.
Тагиров Н.С., Хайцев Н.В., Назаров Т.Х., и др. Значение андрогенного дефицита в патогенезе уролитиаза: Экспериментальное и клиническое исследование // Клиническая патофизиология. 2016. Т. 22, № 1. С. 107–112. EDN: WAHDYD.
Тагиров Н.С. Оценка эффективности хирургического лечения мочекаменной болезни на фоне заместительной терапии препаратами тестостерона // Педиатр. 2019. Т. 10, № 2. С. 46–54. doi: 10.17816/PED10247-54 EDN: EUXYNH.
Тагиров Н.С. Патогенетическая коррекция метаболических нарушений и андрогенного дефицита в лечении больных уролитиазом (клинико-экспериментальное исследование): автореф. дис. … докт. мед. наук. Санкт-Петербург, 2019. Режим доступа: https://vmeda.mil.ru/upload/site56/document_file/h5OPa Cx Tzp.pdf.
Эмиргаев З.К., Тагиров Н.С., Васильев А.Г., Эмиргаев О.К. Состояние системы гемостаза у мужчин, больных уролитиазом, проходивших лечение в условиях пандемии COVID-19 // Российские биомедицинские исследования. 2024. Т. 9, № 3. С. 28–34. doi: 10.56871/RBR.2024.90.67.004 EDN: IRVPYE.
Aleebrahim-Dehkordi E., Soleiman-Dehkordi E., Saberianpour S., et al. Care and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic quarantine: sedentary lifestyle and increased risk of kidney stones // Przegl Epidemiol. 2021. Vol. 75, N 1. P. 45–50. doi: 10.32394/pe.75.04.
El-Achkar T.M., Wu X.R., Rauchman M., et al. Tamm–Horsfall protein protects the kidney from ischemic injury by decreasing inflammation and altering TLR4 expression // Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008. Vol. 295, N 2. P. F534–F544. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00083.2008.
Gul M., Kaynar M., Yildiz M., et al. The increased risk of complicated ureteral stones in the era of COVID-19 pandemic // J Endourol. 2020. Vol. 34, N 8. P. 882–886. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0658.
Harke N.N., Radtke J.P., Hadaschik B.A., et al. To defer or not to defer? A German longitudinal multicentric assessment of clinical practice in urology during the COVID-19 pandemic // PLo S One. 2020. Vol. 15, N 9. ID e0239027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239027.
Nakagawa Y. Properties and function of nephrocalcin: mechanism of kidney stone inhibition or promotion // Keio J Med. 1997. Vol. 46, N 1. P. 1–9. doi: 10.2302/kjm.46.1.
Nourian A., Uppaluri C., Chen M., et al. Comparison of management and outcomes of symptomatic urolithiasis during the COVID-19 pandemic to a comparative cohort // Urology. 2022. Vol. 165. P. 178–183. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.019.
Vazzana N., Dipaola F., Ognibene S. Procalcitonin and secondary bacterial infections in COVID-19: association with disease severity and outcomes // Acta Clin Belg. 2022. Vol. 77, N 2. P. 268–272. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1824749.
Wong V.K.F., Bhojani N., Bird V., et al. Quality of life of urolithiasis patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-institutional cross-sectional study // J Endourol. 2022. Vol. 36, N 6. P. 798–806. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0298.
Xiao N., Xie Z., He Z., et al. Pathogenesis of gout: Exploring more therapeutic target // Int J Rheum Dis. 2024. Vol. 27, N 4. ID e15147. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.15147.
Zhu W., Liu Y., Lan Y., et al. Dietary vinegar prevents kidney stone recurrence via epigenetic regulations // EBio Medicine. 2019. Vol. 45. P. 231–250. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.06.004.



