Respiratory distress in preterm newborns: clinical featers and intensive care tactics

ORIGINAL STUDIES

  • Yurii S. Aleksandrovich Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
  • Jamilya A. Temirova Maternity Hospital No. 10, Saint Petersburg, Russia
  • Dmitry O. Ivanov Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
  • Dmitry A. Lebedev Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
Keywords:
респираторный дистресс новорожденные недоношенные респираторная поддержка respiratory distress newborns premature infants respiratory support

Abstract

Background. Respiratory disorders or respiratory distress are the most common cause of hospitalization of a newborn in the intensive care unit, and this is typical for both full-term and premature infants.

Aim — to determine the priorities of intensive care tactics for respiratory distress in premature newborns of different gestational age by studying the clinical and laboratory features of its course.

Materials and methods. A retrospective observational multicenter study was performed on 155 newborns, who were divided into two conditional groups depending on the gestational age. Group I included 120 premature newborns with a gestational age of up to 34 weeks, and group II included 35 late premature infants (gestational age — 34–36 (6/7) weeks).

Results. Group I showed lower Apgar scores both one minute and 5 minutes after birth. The median score on the Silverman–Andersen scale in the group I was 5 points, which was statistically significantly higher than in the group II (4 points). The severity of multiple organ dysfunction on the nSOFA (Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) scale was higher in patients of the I group (3 vs 2; p=0.006). The median duration of mechanical ventilation in the I group of patients was significantly higher (263 vs 63 hours; p=0.006). Arterial hypotension was registered in the first 24 hours of life in 19 (12.2%) premature infants: 18 (15%) patients in the group I and 1 (2.8%) child — in the group II, the differences were statistically significant (p=0.04). Median volume of volumetric load in the first day of life in the group I was 89, and in the group II — 70 ml/kg in day, which was statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were obtained in terms of the level of hourly diuresis and hydrobalance. Diuresis was 3.6–3.1 ml/kg in hour and was within the permissible values. Inotropic-vasopressor support was provided to 45 (29%) premature infants: 40 (33.3%) patients in group I and 5 (14.3%) in group II. The differences were statistically significant (p=0.02). In group I, the median of the vasotropy-inotropic index was 11.2 [5; 12.5], in group II — 8.6 [5; 10], the differences are statistically significant (p=0.03).

Conclusion. Early premature infants are a more vulnerable group of newborns who have a severe course of respiratory distress, which requires longer respiratory and more intensive hemodynamic support.

References

Александрович Ю.С., Темирова Д.А., Васильев С.В., Боронина И.В., Быков Ю.В. Эпидемиология и исходы респираторного дистресса у новорожденных. Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2023;20(3):75–83. https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2023-20-3-75-83.

Антонов А.Г., Буров А.А., Володин Н.Н. и др. Реанимация и стабилизация состояния новорожденных детей в родильном зале (методическое письмо). Неонатология. Новости, мнения, обучение. 2020;8(1):34–52

Иванов Д.О., Александрович Ю.С., Темирова Д.А. Респираторный дистресс у новорожденных: современное состояние проблемы (обзор литературы). Вестник анестезиологии и реаниматологии. 2024;21(2):112–121. https://doi.org/10.24884/2078-5658-2024-21-2-112-121.

Караваева А.Л., Тимофеева Л.А., Цечоева Т.К., Тютюнник В.Л., Кан Н.Е., Зубков В.В. Поздние недоношенные в зоне повышенного внимания. Обзор литературы. Часть 2. Особенности заболеваемости поздних недоношенных новорожденных. Нео­натология: новости, мнения, обучение. 2023;11(1): 65–75. https://doi.org/10.33029/2308-2402-2023-11-1-65-75.

Кирилочев О.К. Побочные проявления искусственной вентиляции легких и катетеризации подключичной вены у новорожденных. Педиатрия им. Г.Н. Сперанского. 2020;99(1):242–243.

Alfarwati T.W., Alamri A.A., Alshahrani M.A., Al-Wassia H. Incidence, Risk factors and Outcome of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Term Infants at Academic Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Med Arch. 2019;73(3):183–186. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2019.73.183-186.

Aynalem Y.A., Mekonen H., Akalu T.Y., Habtewold T.D., Endalamaw A., Petrucka P.M. et al. Incidence of respiratory distress and its predictors among neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, Black Lion Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0235544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235544.

Dilli D., Akduman H., Orun U.A. et al. Predictive value of vasoactive-inotropic score for mortality in newborns undergoing cardiac surgery. Indian Pediatr. 2019;56(9):735–740.

Downes J.J., Vidyasagar D., Boggs T.R., Jr., Morrow G.M. Respiratory distress syndrome of newborn infants. A new clinical scoring system (RDS score) with acid-base and blood-gas correlations. Clin Pediat. 1970;9(6):325–31.

Hedstrom A.B., Gove N.E., Mayock D.E. et al. Performance of the Silverman Andersen respiratory severity score in predicting pCO2 and respiratory support in newborns: a prospective cohort study. J Perinatol. 2018;38(5):505–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0049-3.

Hirata K., Ueda K., Ikehara S. et al. Growth and respiratory status at 3 years of age after moderate preterm, late preterm and early term births: the Japan environment and children’s study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2025;110(2):145–150. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327033.

Jiang H., Bu X., Chen C., Zhou J. Association between gestational age and neonatal respiratory failure in term infants. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):12687. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97197-8.

Kommawar A., Borkar R., Vagha J., Lakhkar B., Meshram R., Taksandae A. Study of respiratory distress in newborn. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2017;4(2):490–494. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20170695.

Mahoney A.D., Jain L. Respiratory Disorders in moderately preterm, late preterm, and early term infants, clinics in perinato­logy. 2013;40(4):665–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2013.07.004.

Mishra K.N., Kumar P., Gaurav P. Aetiology and prevalence of respiratory distress in newborns delivered at DMCH, Darbhanga, Bihar, India. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2020;9(48):3655–3659.

Silverman W.A., Andersen D.H. A controlled clinical trial of effects of water mist on obstructive respiratory signs, death rate and necropsy findings among premature infants. Pediatrics. 1956;17(1):1–10.

Tao Y., Han X., Guo W.L. et al. Predictors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in 625 neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. J Trop Pediatr. 2022;68(3):fmac037. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmac037.

Tochie J.N., Sibetcheu A.T., Arrey-Ebot P.E. et al. Global, regional and national trends in the burden of neonatal respiratory failure and essentials of its diagnosis and management from 1992 to 2022: a scoping review. Eur J Pediatr. 2024;183(1):9–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-05238-z.

Wynn J., Polin R. Progress in the management of neonatal sepsis: the importance of a consensus definition. Pediatr Res. 2018;83 (1-1):13–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.224.