Electroneuromyography in pediatric practice (literature review)
REVIEWS
Abstract
One of the most informative diagnostic methods for diseases of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system is electromyography, a diagnostic technique based on the registration and evaluation of electrical potentials that occur during muscle contraction or peripheral nerve activation in response to electrical stimulation of the nerves. This method is characterized by high variability in the obtained potential parameters: amplitude, latency, morphology, the ratio of these parameters between responses recorded at different stimulation points, as well as conduction velocities along motor and sensory fibers of peripheral nerves. The performance of electromyography in children is associated with several additional complicating factors, such as the high sensitivity of children to the procedures, the difficulty in ensuring patient immobility, and the dependence of the obtained data on the age of the subject. This study involved a review of recent domestic and international literature on the use of electromyography in pediatric practice. Currently, two main electrophysiological methods are used: stimulation electromyography and needle electromyography. In the first case, the conduction of signals along peripheral nerves is assessed, while in the second, the condition of individual muscle fibers is evaluated. During the examination, diseases of the muscles, peripheral nervous system, and spinal cord can be identified; it is also possible to compare the obtained results to assess inter-lateral asymmetry and track the dynamics of pathological processes over time. Electromyography is a highly informative diagnostic tool for neuromuscular system diseases in children; however, when conducting the study, it is important to take into account the age-related features of nervous system development and adapt the procedure according to the physiological and behavioral characteristics of the subjects.
References
Абабков В.А., Авакян Г.Н. , Авдюнина И.А. и др. Неврология: национальное руководство. Т. 1. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2018. 880 с.
Абедимова Р.А. Значение электронейромиографии в ранней диагностике диабетической полинейропатии у детей. Вестник. 2010;9(1):97.
Егорова А.А., Береснева В.Т., Гладин Д.П., Метляева А.В. Электромиографические признаки прогресса развития амбидекстрии. Российские биомедицинские исследования.2024;9(4);48–53. https://doi.org/10.56871/RBR.2024.95.20.008.
Команцев В.Н., Моллаева К.Ю., Умаханова З.Р. Клинико-электронейромиографический алгоритм топической диагностики синдрома мышечной гипотонии у детей раннего возраста. Доктор.Ру. 2020;19(9):20–26. https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2020-19-9-20-26.
Ляжьев П.О., Фомина М.Ю., Ракова М.А. Нейрофизиологическая диагностика пациента с эпилептической энцефалопатией младенческого возраста и мышечной гипотонией. Forcipe. 2023;6(Suppl 1):373–374.
Ляжьев П.О., Фомина М.Ю., Ракова М.А. Динамика клинических и электронейромиографических показателей пациента, страдающего юношеским дерматомиозитом на фоне терапии глюкокортикостероидами. Материалы VIII Национального конгресса с международным участием. «Здоровые дети — будущее страны». СПб.; 2024. С. 127–128.
Мазуренко Е.С., Руяткина Л.А., Пахомов И.А., Чешева Е.В., Гаврилова Л.О. Ранняя диагностика диабетической дистальной полинейропатии с помощью электронейромиографии. Сахарный диабет. 2019;22(2):141–150. https://doi.org/10.14341/DM9830.
Петряйкина Е.Е., Лаптев Д.Н., Воронцова И.Г., Демидов Н.А., Ряполова Ю.А. Сахарный диабет 1 типа у детей и подростков г. Москвы. Данные Московского сегмента Федерального регистра больных сахарным диабетом 2015–2020 гг. Проблемы эндокринологии. 2021;67(6):113–123. https://doi.org/10.14341/probl12795.
Ремнев А.Г., Олейников А.А. Электронейромиография: анализируемые параметры. Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2013;(10-2):281–282. EDN: RCMTJZ.
Руяткина Л.А., Полторацкая Е.С., Пахомов И.А., Руяткин Д.С., Щепанкевич Л.А., Первунинская М.А. Электронейромиография в диагностике ранних стадий диабетической нейропатии — приглашение к дискуссии эндокринологов, неврологов, электрофизиологов. Медицинский совет. 2016;(10): 158–164.
Ahmed M.I., Iqbal M., Hussain N. A structured approach to the assessment of a floppy neonate. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2016;11(1):2–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/1817-1745.181250.
Akbari M.G. et al. Normal values of nerve conduction studies in children aged 7 days to 14 years referred to electrodiagnosis clinic of Iranian children’s medical center. Iran J Pediatr.2023;33(5):e137205. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp-137205.
Botre A., Mishra A., Kadam S. The youngest pediatric Guillain Barre syndrome associated with COVID-19 infection. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2021;24(5):793–794. https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_52_21.
Buschbacher R.M., Prahlow N.D. Manual of nerve conduction studies. Demos Medical Publishing, 2006. P. xi.
Dunker Ø., Nilsen K.B., Olsen S.E., Åsvold B.O., Bjørgaas M.R.R., Sand T. Which combined nerve conduction study scores are best suited for polyneuropathy in diabetic patients? Muscle Nerve. 2022;65(2):171–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.27445.
Dutta D.J., Woo D.H., Lee P.R., Pajevic S., Bukalo O., Huffman W.C., Wake H., Basser P.J., Sheikh Bahaei S., Lazarevic V., Smith J.C., Fields R.D. Regulation of myelin structure and conduction velocity by perinodal astrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(46):11832–11837. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811013115. Erratum in: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(25):12574. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908361116.
Esteves E.A., Guio S.P., de Los Reyes-Guevara C.A., Cantor E., Habeych M.E., Malagón A.L. Reference values of upper extremity nerve conduction studies in a Colombian population. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2020;5:73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2020.02.001.
Frenzel T., Baum A.K., Krause H., Arens C., Haghikia A., Galazky I. Sensory nerve conduction studies in infants, children and teenagers — An update. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2024;9:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2024.01.001.
Ferrante M.A. Neuromuscular electrodiagnosis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2023;195:251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-98818-6.00019-4.
Hyllienmark L., Ludvigsson J., Brismar T. Normal values of nerve conduction in children and adolescents. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control. 1995;97(5):208–214.
Javankiani S., Nasrollahizadeh A., Gharib B., Heidari M., Memarian S. The characteristics of Guillain–Barre syndrome in children in pre-COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2023;6(12):e1782. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1782.
Joyal K.M., MacGregor J.V., Hayawi L.M., Webster R.J., McMillan H.J. Not so shocking: electromyography in pediatrics remains feasible and diagnostically useful. Can J Neurol Sci.2022;49(5):696–702. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2021.196.
Kartheka R., Aghoram R., Faith A.J., Wadwekar V. Cross-sectional study of the relationship between medial plantar nerve conduction studies and severity of diabetic neuropathy. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2024;27(2):183–187. https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_828_23.
Krøigård T., Gylfadottir S.S., Itani M., Khan K.S., Andersen H., Sindrup S.H., Jensen T.S., Andersen K.V., Tankisi H., Beniczky S., Kristensen A.G. Normative reference values for the dorsal sural nerve derived from a large multicenter cohort. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021;6:239–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2021.08.001.
Lamberti P.M., Light T.R. Carpal tunnel syndrome in children. Hand Clin. 2002;18(2):331–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0712(01)00010-5.
Lee J.H., Kim E., Shim H.S., Kang M.G., Kim K., Lee S.Y., Lee G.J., Lee S.U., Lim J.Y., Chung S.G., Oh B.M. Reference standard of median nerve conduction study in Korea. Ann Rehabil Med.2024;48(4):259–270. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.240015.
Lo Y.L., Tan Y.E., Hwang R., Teng P.P.C. Utility of sensory nerve conduction study in radiologically positive lumbosacral plexopathy. Can J Neurol Sci. 2024;51(1):134–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2023.31.
Malessy M.J., Pondaag W. Nerve surgery for neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2011;4(2):141–148. https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-2011-0166.
Monaghan M., Bryant B.L., Inverso H., Moore H.R., Streisand R. Young children with type 1 diabetes: recent advances in behavioral research. Curr Diab Rep. 2022;22(6):247–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-022-01465-0.
Mondelli M., Aretini A., Ginanneschi F. Electrophysiological study of the tibial nerve across the tarsal tunnel in distal symmetric diabetic polyneuropathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil.2022;101(2):152–159. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001769.
Electrodiagnostic testing in the pediatric patient. Musculoskeletal Key. Available at: https://musculoskeletalkey.com/electrodiagnostic-testing-in-the-pediatric-patient-2/ (accessed:19.01.2025).
Oberhauser S.S., l’Allemand D., Willems E.P., Gozzi T., Heldt K., Eilers M., Stasinaki A., Lütschg J., Broser P.J. Slowing of peripheral nerve conduction velocity in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes is predicted by glucose fluctuations. Diabetes. 2023;72(12):1835–1840. https://doi.org/10.2337/db23-0063.
Okuma A., Nakamura T., Katsuno M., Matsushita T. Elucidation of peripheral nerve myelination by bimodal waveform analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2022;440:120346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2022.120346.
Pacaud D., Romanchuk K.G., Virtanen H., Ferdousi M., Nettel-Aguirre A., Mah J.K., Tavakoli M., Zochodne D.W., Malik R.A. Corneal nerve and nerve conduction abnormalities in children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23(8):1665–1673. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.13419.
Parikh C., Patel S., Shah J., Tandon R., Jetha K. Guillain–Barre syndrome following subclinical COVID-19 infection in a child. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(6):3333–3335. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1407_21.
Paro-Panjan D., Neubauer D. congenital hypotonia: is there an algorithm? J Child Neurol. 2004;19(6):439–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/088307380401900608.
Pitt M.C. Nerve conduction studies and needle EMG in very small children. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012;16(3):285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2011.07.014.
Rabben O.K. Sensory nerve conduction studies in children. Age-related changes of conduction velocities. Neuropediatrics. 1995;26(01):26–32.
Ray S.T.J., Abdel-Mannan O., Sa M., Fuller C., Wood G.K., Pysden K., Yoong M., McCullagh H., Scott D. et al; CoroNerve study group. Neurological manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalised children and adolescents in the UK: a prospective national cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5(9):631–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00193-0. Erratum in: Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5(9):e38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00238-8. Erratum in: Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021;5(12):e46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00331-X.
Ryan C.S., Conlee E.M., Sharma R., Sorenson E.J., Boon A.J., Laughlin R.S. Nerve conduction normal values for electrodiagnosis in pediatric patients. Muscle Nerve. 2019;60(2):155–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26499.
Schiller K., Kofler M., Frühwirth M., Fantur M., Rauchenzauner M. Long-term HbA1c, physical fitness, nerve conduction velocities, and quality of life in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus — a pilot study. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8(4):384. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040384.
Smith B.W., Chang K.W.C., Yang L.J.S., Spires M.C. Comparative accuracies of electrodiagnostic and imaging studies in neonatal brachial plexus palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019;23(1):119–124. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.7.PEDS18193.
Van der Looven R., Le Roy L., Tanghe E., van den Broeck C., de Muynck M., Vingerhoets G., Pitt M., Vanderstraeten G. Early electrodiagnosis in the management of neonatal brachial plexus palsy: A systematic review. Muscle Nerve. 2020;61(5):557–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26762.
Weiss L.D., Weiss J.M., Silver J.K. Easy EMG e-book: A guide to performing nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015. С. vii.



